>dataset
yst01g
>instances
0,-702,GCGTGCTTGTGTAG
6,-427,CTTCACAACCACTG
7,-257,GTGTGGGTGTGAGG
7,-588,ACGCACAATCACTC
3,-195,GTGTGTTTGTGTAT
8,-749,CTGCAAGAACACCC
4,-437,CGACAAAAACACTG
1,-284,GTGGGATCGTGAAG
8,-406,ATACACAACCACTG
7,-808,CACCAAACACACAC
5,-470,CATCACAATCACAT
4,-711,CTTCAAAAAAACTC
3,-26,CCCAACAAACCCCC
The above motif has the most significant group specificity score (1.28E-10) but only a moderate MAP score (6).  We are thus less confident about this prediction.
>dataset
yst02g
>instances
We didn't find any significant motif.  This is probably due to the small size of the input set.
>dataset
yst03m
>instances
0,-403,TTAGGTACTGCT
2,-377,TTATGAGCTGCA
3,-294,TGTGGTGCTGTT
3,-224,TTGGGGGCTGGA
4,-244,AGCAGCTCCCAA
4,-177,TGAGGAGCTGCT
6,-181,TTGGGAGTTGCT
7,-407,TTTTGCACTGCT
7,-269,TTGTGGACTGCA
The above motif has the most significant group specificity score (8.55E-11) but only a moderate MAP score (6.5).  We are thus less confident about this prediction.
>dataset
yst04r
>instances
0,-641,CGCGAATCCT
0,-361,TGGAATGGCG
1,-339,CTGGCATCCA
2,-652,CGGGATTCCT
2,-189,CGGCCTTCCT
3,-487,CGAGCTTCCA
3,-229,CGTGATTCCT
4,-920,CTTGATTCCA
4,-476,TGGAATCCCG
4,-458,CTGGCATCCA
5,-642,CGGGCTTCCA
5,-595,CGGGATTCCT
The above motif has the most significant group specificity score (4.19E-9) and a high MAP score (12).  
>dataset
yst05r
>instances
We didn't find any significant motif.  This is probably due to the small size of the input set.  
>dataset
yst06g
>instances
We didn't find any significant motif.
>dataset
yst07m
>instances
0,-323,GTCTTCGCGT
0,-78,TGCTTCGGGT
2,-121,ACGGGAAGAA
3,-166,TGCTTCCGGT
4,-489,TGCTTCGGGT
4,-113,TTCTTCGGAT
4,-99,TTCTTCCGGT
5,-326,GCCGGAAGAA
The above motif has both the most significant MAP (8.52E-10) and group specificity (12) scores.
>dataset
yst08r
>instances
first motif:
0,-468,CACCCAAACAC
0,-20,CACACAAACAC
2,-797,GCGACTGGGTG
2,-633,CACCCATACCT
3,-653,CACCCAGACAT
4,-786,GGGCATGGGCG
4,-614,CACACAAACAC
4,-453,CACCCACGCGC
4,-422,CGCACACGCCC
4,-409,CACCCAGACCT
4,-388,GGGCATGGGTA
4,-175,GTGTTTGCGCG
6,-446,CACCCAATCCC
6,-424,CCCCCACACAC
6,-333,CACCCAAGCAC
7,-900,CACCCAAACAT
7,-436,CACCCACACAT
7,-420,CACCCAGACCG
8,-910,GGGTATGGGGT
8,-416,CACCCAATCAC
8,-72,CACGCATACAT
9,-473,AACCCAGACAC
1,-431,ACACCGCACGCC
1,-325,TGGTTGTATTGA
1,-40,TCATAACACCAA
2,-639,ACACTGCACCCA
2,-479,TTCGTGTGATGA
3,-581,GGCGTGTGATGT
3,-383,TGAGTGCTTTGT
3,-324,TGCTTGTGATGT
3,-37,ACAAGACACCAA
4,-932,TGCTTGTTTTGT
4,-459,AGACCACACCCA
4,-383,TGGGTACAATGT
5,-636,TGGTTGTAATGT
6,-452,ACATCACACCCA
6,-339,TCAAAACACCCA
8,-904,GGGGTATACTGT
8,-826,TGGTTGTGATGT
8,-422,ACAAAGCACCCA
8,-87,CCATTACACGCA
The above two motifs both have high MAP (28 and 12) and group specificity scores (2.96E-7 and 8.72E-7).
>dataset
yst09g
>instances
2,-545,AGCCGTGGACG
2,-156,AGCCGCCGACA
4,-249,AGCCGCGCAAG
6,-734,CTTGGGCGGCT  
8,-983,CATCAGCGGCA  
9,-598,CCTGCGCGGCT  
10,-611,AGCCGCCAAAA 
11,-483,AGCCGCCGGAG 
12,-244,AGCCGCCGAAA 
14,-552,CCTGCGCAGCT 
14,-248,CATCGGCGGCA 
15,-447,AGCCGCCGACG 
15,-305,CTTCGGTGGCA
The above motif has both high MAP (11) and group specificity (2.17E-8) scores.
>dataset
yst10m
>instances
0,-880,CTTAAAAAAGACATCT
0,-772,CTTACAAATGATGTTT
0,-743,ACACTTCTGCTTTTCG
0,-529,CTAATAGATGAAATCT
1,-886,GATATAAAAGATGTGC
1,-116,CGGAAAGAAGATCTAT
2,-825,CAAAAAAAAGAACTCC
3,-734,AAACATCTTCTGTTGG
3,-472,GTTATAGAAGAATTAC
4,-987,CCAAGAGAAGAGATTT
4,-326,CTTATAGAAGAGGTCC
The above motif has the most significant group specificity score (5.02E-7) but only a moderate MAP score (7.3).  We are thus less confident about this prediction, especially with the small input set.
>dataset
dm01g
>instances
We didn't find any significant motif.  This is probably due to the small size of the input set.  
>dataset
dm02r
>instances
The input set is too small to generate motifs with significant scores.
>dataset
dm03m
>instances
0,-1691,TTTCCGGCTGC
0,-1352,ATTGCCTTAAA
0,-608,TTGAAGGCAGC
0,-312,TTTAAGGAAGC
0,-35,TTTAAGGCTGC
1,-1983,TTTAACGCAGC
1,-162,TTAAAGGAGGC
2,-1974,GTGGCCTTAAA
2,-1364,GTCGCCTTAAA
2,-47,GCGGCCTGAAA
The above motif has the most significant group specificity score (3.00E-4) and moderate MAP score (5.8).  We are less confident about this prediction.
>dataset
dm04g
>instances
We didn't find any significant motif.  This is probably due to the small size of the input set.  
>dataset
dm05g
>instances
We didn't find any significant motif.  This is probably due to the small size of the input set.  
>dataset
dm06r
>instances
The input set is too small to generate motifs with significant scores.
>dataset
dm07m
>instances
We didn't find any significant motif.  This is probably due to the small size of the input set.  
>dataset
dm08m
>instances
We didn't find any significant motif.  This is probably due to the small size of the input set.  
>dataset
mus01r
>instances
0,-456,GCTTTTCCTCAGT
0,-399,GCTATTCTTCCAT
0,-288,AGCTAAGAATAGC
0,-217,AAGAAAGAATAGG
0,-168,GCTATTCTTAGAT
2,-310,AGCTAAGAAAAGC
The above motif has the most significant MAP score (11) and a moderate group specificity score (6.61E-5).
>dataset
mus02r
>instances
We didn't find any significant motif.  
>dataset
mus03g
>instances
0,-455,ACAGTGCCCAGGCCGT
0,-140,GTGTTGCCCAGGCAGT
0,-123,ACTACCTGGAAAAGCT
1,-370,GGTTTTCCCAGCAGAT
1,-83,AATTTTCCCAGCTTAT
2,-130,ATTTTGCGCAAGACAT
2,-118,ACATTTCCCAAGTCCT
2,-88,ACAGCTTGGATAAGCT
3,-304,ACCTTCCCCAGCTTCT
3,-211,AGTTTGCCCAGGACAG
The above motif has the most significant MAP score (6.44E-7) and a relatively high MAP score (9.6).  Given the small size of the input set, we are less confident about this prediction.
>dataset
mus04m
>instances
0,-755,AGGAAGGGCGG    
0,-414,CAGCTAATCCT    
1,-850,CACCCCATCCT   
1,-769,CCACTCACCCC    
1,-570,AGGCTGAGTGG    
1,-101,CCCCCAAACCC   
2,-878,AGGCTTGGTTG    
3,-987,GGGATGAGCGG    
3,-78,GGGCTGGGCGG     
4,-641,AGGATGAGCTG    
5,-526,AGGCTGAGCGG    
5,-289,CCACTCAACCT    
6,-354,AGGGTTGGCTG  
6,-38,CCGCCCACCCT
The above motif has both relatively high MAP (9.8) and group specificity (5.74E-7) scores.  
>dataset
mus05r
>instances
We didn't find any significant motif.  This is probably due to the small size of the input set.  
>dataset
mus06g
>instances
0,-379,AGGTCAGACA
0,-148,GCGACAGAGA
0,-107,GGGTCAGACC
1,-491,AGGACAGTGA
1,-326,TCTCTGTCCT
1,-260,GGAACAGACC
1,-225,GGGACAGACC
2,-182,GCGACAGACC
2,-106,TCTCTGTCCC
The above motif has the most significant MAP score (11) but only a moderate group specificity score (1.19E-4).  We are thus less confident about this prediction.
>dataset
mus07g
>instances
We didn't find any significant motif.  This is probably due to the small size of the input set.  
>dataset
mus08m
>instances
0,-984,CTGCTCCAATATA
0,-824,TATATGGGCGAAG
0,-499,CTGCTACCATTTT
1,-1251,AATATTGCTGGAG
1,-850,AATAAGGTGGCAG
1,-628,CATCGCCAATATA
1,-499,TAAATTGAAGTAG
2,-1430,CTCTGGCAATATA
2,-895,CTGCAGCAATATA
2,-763,CTTCCTCAAAATT
The above motif has the most significant group specificity score (5.98E-5) and a moderate MAP score (6.3).  We are less confident about this prediction.
>dataset
mus09r
>instances
The input set is too small to generate motifs with significant scores.
>dataset
mus10g
>instances
1,-740,TCTTTTCTTT
2,-851,GAAGAAAAGA
3,-984,GAAGAAAAGA
3,-897,GGAGAAAAGT
3,-887,GAAGAAAGGA
3,-296,GGAGACAAGA
5,-976,TCTTTTATCC
5,-49,TCTTGTCTCC
6,-75,CCTTTTCTTC
7,-818,TCTTTTCTTC
7,-288,AAAGAAAAGA
9,-817,TCTTTTCTCC
9,-20,CCTTTTCTCC
10,-787,GGAGAGAAGA
12,-997,GGATAAAAGA
12,-949,GAAGAAAAAA
12,-452,TCCTTTCTCC
12,-377,GAAGACAGGA
The above motif has high MAP (22) and group specificity (2.67E-6) scores.
>dataset
mus11m
>instances
0,-80,GAGAGCCCCA
1,-358,GAGGGGCACC
2,-48,TGTGGCCATC
3,-221,GTGGGGCCCC
3,-115,GAGAGGCCCA
4,-364,GAGGGGCCCT
4,-326,GGGGGCCCTC
4,-63,GGTGGCCATC   
6,-205,GAGGACCCCA  
7,-388,GACGGCCCCC  
8,-45,GGGGGCCGTC   
9,-243,GAGAGGCCCA  
10,-497,TGGGCTCCTC 
10,-309,GATGGGCCCA 
10,-269,GAGGGGCACC 
10,-174,GAGGAGCCCA 
10,-73,GTGGGGCCCC
The above motif has the most significant group specificity score (9.35E-11) and a high MAP score (11).
>dataset
mus12m
>instances
We didn't find any significant motif.  This is probably due to the small size of the input set.  
>dataset
hm01g
>instances
We didn't find any significant motif.
>dataset
hm02r
>instances
0,-593,CCCAGGACAC
0,-383,CCCAGCACAC
0,-272,GCCAGGACAC
0,-183,GTGGTCTGGG
0,-83,CCCAGCACAC
0,-38,CTCAGCACAG
1,-564,GTGGGCTGAG
2,-880,GTGTTTTGAG
3,-541,CTCAGCACAG
3,-181,CCCAAAACAC
4,-826,GTGTTCTGAG
4,-431,CCCAACACAC
6,-937,CCCAGCACAC
6,-896,GTGTGCTGAT
7,-291,CCCAGCACCC
7,-183,GTGTGCAGAG
7,-103,GTGTGCAGGC
8,-838,GGGTGCTGGG
8,-599,GCCAGCACAC
The above motif has the most significant group specificity score (7.92E-8) and a high MAP score (16).
>dataset
hm03r
>instances
0,-1243,TGTGGATAAAAGA 
0,-522,GGTGGAGCAAAAA   
0,-93,TGTGGCTTAAAGA    
1,-1166,TGTGGATAAAAGA  
1,-89,TGTGGCTTAAAGA   
2,-371,TGTGGATTCAAAA  
2,-89,TGTGGCTTAAAAA
3,-184,TGTGGAGAAAACA
4,-462,TGTGGGTGCAAAT
5,-732,TTTTTTCACCACC
5,-273,AGTGGGTCCAACA  
6,-234,TGTGGGTCATAGA   
7,-1149,TTTGGCTGCAACA  
7,-465,TGTGGTTACTAAA
The above motif has the most significant group specificity score (3.35E-7) and a high MAP score (12).
>dataset
hm04m
>instances
1,-519,AAAAATCCCGC  
2,-85,GCGGGCTTTTT   
3,-672,AAAATTCCCCC
3,-334,AAAATTCCAGC 
4,-1633,GCTGGCGTTTT 
4,-1228,AAAAAACCCGC
6,-741,GCGGGAGATTT 
7,-1791,GCGGGTGTTTA 
7,-1478,TAAAGTCCACC  
7,-878,AAAATTCCCCC   
8,-1132,AAAATTCCAGC  
8,-611,TAAACTCCCGC 
9,-321,GCCGGAATTTT 
11,-1993,AAAACTCCCCC
12,-1007,AAAAATCCCGC
The above motif has the most significant group specificity score (5.89E-13) but only a moderate MAP score (6.7).  We are thus less confident about this prediction.
>dataset
hm05r
>instances
We didn't find any significant motif.  This is probably due to the small size of the input set.  
>dataset
hm06g
>instances
We didn't find any significant motif.  
>dataset
hm07m
>instances
We didn't find any significant motif.  This is probably due to the small size of the input set.  
>dataset
hm08m
>instances
3,-240,ATGACGTCAA
6,-143,TTGACGTCAT
8,-98,GTGACATCAA
10,-114,ATGACATCAC
11,-81,GTGACGTCAC
5,-182,GTGACGTCAC
6,-125,TTGACGTCAG
4,-182,ATGACGTCCA
13,-405,ATGACAGCAA
6,-105,TTGATGTCCT
4,-271,ATGAGATCAC
The above motif has both high MAP (9.2) and group specificity (2.16E-9) scores.
>dataset
hm09g
>instances
We didn't find any significant motif.  
>dataset
hm10m
>instances
0,-447,CTTCTATTTTTT
0,-371,AGAAAAGGAGTG
0,-304,CCTCCCTTCTCC
0,-76,AAAAAATGGCTC
1,-381,CGCCCCTTCTCC
1,-205,AGAAAAGGGGTT
2,-396,CTCCCCTTCTTT
2,-329,CCCCCATTCTCT
3,-206,AGTAAAGGGCAG
3,-177,AGAAAAAAGCGG
3,-136,AGAGAAGAGCCC
4,-90,CTTCTCTTCTCT
4,-44,CGGCCTTTTTCC
5,-239,CGTCCATTTTCC
5,-119,CGGCCATTTATT
5,-93,GGAAAAGAGGGG
The above motif has the most significant MAP score (16) but only a moderate group specificity score (1.62E-6).  We are thus less confident about this prediction.
>dataset
hm11g
>instances
We didn't find any significant motif.  
>dataset
hm12r
>instances
The input set is too small to generate motifs with significant scores.
>dataset
hm13r
>instances
We didn't find any significant motif.  
>dataset
hm14r
>instances
The input set is too small to generate motifs with significant scores.
>dataset
hm15r
>instances
We didn't find any significant motif.  This is probably due to the small size of the input set.  
>dataset
hm16g
>instances
We didn't find any significant motif.  
>dataset
hm17g
>instances
0,-78,GGGAATTTCC
1,-78,GGGAATTTCC
2,-80,GGGAATTTCC
3,-169,GGAAATTCCG
4,-261,GGAGATTCCT
4,-138,GGAAATTCCC
6,-269,GGGAATCTCC
7,-74,GGGATTTTCC
8,-81,GGGAATTTCC
9,-135,GGGGATTTCC
The above motif has the most significant group specificity score (6.97E-11) and a high MAP score (25).
>dataset
hm18m
>instances
We didn't find any significant motif.  This is probably due to the small size of the input set.  
>dataset
hm19g
>instances
We didn't find any significant motif.  This is probably due to the small size of the input set.  
>dataset
hm20r
>instances
first motif:
0,-1556,AGACAGAACTG
2,-1767,CATCGCTGGGT
3,-1034,CAGTTCTGTCT
4,-1330,AGCCAGGAATG
5,-895,CAGCTCTGGCT
7,-671,ACCCAGGACTG
7,-454,CATCCCTGGGT
11,-1252,AGCCAGAAATG
14,-349,CAGCACTGGCT
14,-67,AGCCAGAACTG
16,-1071,CAGCACTGTGT
17,-1960,ACCCAGGACTG
17,-483,CATTGCTGTGT
20,-732,CAGCCCTGGCT
20,-558,AGACAGCACTG
25,-1519,CATTACTGGGT
26,-1058,AGACAGGAATG
28,-1135,CATTTCTGTGT
28,-331,CAGTGCTGTGT
30,-969,ACCCAGGACTG
31,-474,CAGCCCTGGGT
34,-489,CAGCGCTGGGT
second motif:
4,-1780,CTGTCTCTGAG 
4,-1613,CTGTGTCTGAG
5,-1831,GACAGACACAG
7,-240,GACAGACCCAA
11,-1257,CACAGAGCCAG
13,-1323,CTGTGTCTGTC
15,-1699,CTGGCTCTGTG
15,-1578,CACAGACACAA
15,-903,GACAGATCCAG  
16,-1079,GTCAGAAACAG 
17,-647,TTGTTTCTGAC  
17,-580,GACAGAAACAG 
18,-1983,TTGTATCTGAC 
19,-74,CACAGAAACAG  
20,-931,GACAGAACCAG 
21,-489,GTCAGAGACAG 
28,-1130,CTGTGTCTGTC
31,-1782,CTGGGTCTGAG 
32,-1262,TTGGATCTGTC
32,-1015,CACAGACCCAA
34,-512,GACAGATCCAG
The above two motifs both have high MAP (10 and 9.8) and group specificity scores (3.55E-9 and 1.07E-8).
>dataset
hm21g
>instances
We didn't find any significant motif.  This is probably due to the small size of the input set.  
>dataset
hm22m
>instances
We didn't find any significant motif.  
>dataset
hm23r
>instances
We didn't find any significant motif.  This is probably due to the small size of the input set.  
>dataset
hm24m
>instances
first motif:
2,-200,AGCCTTCTCA
2,-417,AGACTTCTCA
4,-198,GGAGACGGCT
3,-357,AGACGTCTCC
0,-132,TGAGAAGTCC
6,-293,GGACTTCTCA
2,-298,AGCCTGCTCC
4,-353,CGAGAAGGCT
1,-25,TGAGACGGCC
5,-205,GGAGCCGGCT
3,-345,AGACTTATCC
0,-83,AGCCTTCTGC
6,-65,GGAGACGTCG
4,-217,TGAGACGGTT
5,-59,TGAGCAGGCG
7,-153,GGAGCCGTTT
second motif:
3,-90,GCGCGAAATG
4,-435,CTGCGTAAAG   
4,-389,GTCCGAAAAA   
4,-342,GTGCGAAAAA   
5,-37,TATTTCGCGG
5,-14,GCGCGTAATG
6,-84,CTGCGAAAAG    
6,-52,CTTTTCGCGC
7,-361,GTGCGGAAAG   
7,-284,CCCCGAAAAG   
7,-269,TCGCGTAAAG   
7,-98,TATTTCGGGC
7,-51,CTTTTCCCGC
The above two motifs both have (relatively) high MAP (12 and 7.9) and group specificity (9.49E-9 and 1.77E-7) scores.
>dataset
hm25g
>instances
The input set is too small to generate motifs with significant scores.
>dataset
hm26m
>instances
2,-133,CCTTGGGAAGCCC
5,-433,GGGCTTCCCAGGG
1,-423,GGGCTTCCTCTGC
6,-717,GGGCTTCCATCGC
8,-761,CGGCTTCCGCCGG
4,-584,GGGCCTCCTGGGG
5,-344,CCTCCGGCAGCCC
6,-178,CCTTTGGAGGCCC
2,-361,CCCACGGCAGCCC
2,-399,CTCCAGGAAGCCC
3,-910,CGGCTTCCTTAGC
1,-823,GCGACGGCAGCCC
2,-425,GGGCCTCCGCCGC
1,-926,CGGCTGCCGTCGG
5,-835,CGGCCTCCGCAGG
0,-820,GAGCTTCCGCTGG
3,-875,CGGCTTCGGCGGG
8,-241,CCAGCCGCAGCCC
1,-83,CTTCTCGAAGCCC
7,-166,GGGCCTCCGCTAC
1,-640,CCCCAGGAGGCTG
The above motif has high MAP (21) and group specificity (3.07E-7) scores.